Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 6 ans 9 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 52.80 GTexel/s versus 33.9 billion / sec
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 10 nm versus 28 nm
- 4.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 64 Watt
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2666 versus 1749
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 383 versus 368
- 2.7x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 11991 versus 4493
- 6.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 79.859 versus 12.582
- 3.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1137.615 versus 364.463
- 3.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.569 versus 1.254
- 3.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 61.688 versus 18.386
- 8.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 192.566 versus 23.499
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5609 versus 2663
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3708 versus 3478
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 versus 3332
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5609 versus 2663
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3708 versus 3478
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 versus 3332
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 2 Sep 2020 versus 27 November 2013 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 52.80 GTexel/s versus 33.9 billion / sec |
Processus de fabrication | 10 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 64 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2666 versus 1749 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 383 versus 368 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11991 versus 4493 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 79.859 versus 12.582 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1137.615 versus 364.463 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.569 versus 1.254 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 61.688 versus 18.386 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 192.566 versus 23.499 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5609 versus 2663 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 versus 3478 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 versus 3332 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5609 versus 2663 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 versus 3478 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 versus 3332 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
- 3.5x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1058 MHz versus 300 MHz
Vitesse du noyau | 1058 MHz versus 300 MHz |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2666 | 1749 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 383 | 368 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11991 | 4493 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 79.859 | 12.582 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1137.615 | 364.463 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.569 | 1.254 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 61.688 | 18.386 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 192.566 | 23.499 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5609 | 2663 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 | 3478 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3332 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5609 | 2663 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 | 3478 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3332 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 545 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.0 | Kepler |
Nom de code | Tiger Lake GT1 | GK106 |
Date de sortie | 2 Sep 2020 | 27 November 2013 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 594 | 1003 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $109 | |
Prix maintenant | $144.81 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 16.05 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1100 MHz | |
Unités de Compute | 48 | |
Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 1058 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 10 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 211.2 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1.690 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 844.8 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
Pixel fill rate | 13.20 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 52.80 GTexel/s | 33.9 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 64 Watt |
Noyaux CUDA | 384 | |
Performance á point flottant | 812.5 gflops | |
Compte de transistor | 2,540 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One Mini..., 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Largeur | IGP | |
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Hauteur | 4.38" (11.1 cm) | |
Longeur | 5.70" (14.5 cm) | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | One 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 1 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 80.0 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128-bit GDDR5 | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5.0 GB/s | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
TXAA |