Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4

• Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• Around 1% higher boost clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 1085 MHz
• 1216.6x more texture fill rate: 52.80 GTexel/s vs 43.4 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 28 nm
• 4x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 60 Watt
• Around 4% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11991 vs 11526
• Around 88% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 79.859 vs 42.463
• Around 77% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1137.615 vs 642.715
• Around 56% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.569 vs 2.933
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 61.688 vs 26.532
• Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 192.566 vs 133.458
• Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5609 vs 4843
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3708 vs 3683
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 3329
• Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5609 vs 4843
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3708 vs 3683
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 3329

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

• 3.4x more core clock speed: 1020 MHz vs 300 MHz
• Around 67% higher pipelines: 640 vs 384
• Around 46% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3901 vs 2666
• Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 521 vs 383

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2666 3901
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	383 521
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	11991 11526
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	79.859 42.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1137.615 642.715
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4.569 2.933
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	61.688 26.532
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	192.566 133.458
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5609 4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3708 3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 3329
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5609 4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3708 3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 3329

Compare specifications (specs)