Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX350
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 and NVIDIA GeForce MX350 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- Around 12% higher texture fill rate: 52.80 GTexel/s vs 46.98 GTexel/s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 14 nm
- Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 20 Watt
- Around 63% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 383 vs 235
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5609 vs 4655
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5609 vs 4655
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2 Sep 2020 vs 10 Feb 2020 |
| Texture fill rate | 52.80 GTexel/s vs 46.98 GTexel/s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 14 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 20 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 383 vs 235 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5609 vs 4655 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5609 vs 4655 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX350
- 4.5x more core clock speed: 1354 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 33% higher boost clock speed: 1468 MHz vs 1100 MHz
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 640 vs 384
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2807 vs 2666
- Around 13% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 13562 vs 11991
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1354 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1468 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
| Pipelines | 640 vs 384 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2807 vs 2666 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 13562 vs 11991 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 3708 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 3708 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce MX350
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | NVIDIA GeForce MX350 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2666 | 2807 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 383 | 235 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11991 | 13562 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 79.859 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1137.615 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.569 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 61.688 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 192.566 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5609 | 4655 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5609 | 4655 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3356 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1247 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | NVIDIA GeForce MX350 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 12.0 | Pascal |
| Code name | Tiger Lake GT1 | GP107 |
| Launch date | 2 Sep 2020 | 10 Feb 2020 |
| Place in performance rating | 594 | 654 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | 1468 MHz |
| Compute units | 48 | |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1354 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 211.2 GFLOPS | 58.72 GFLOPS (1:32) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1.690 TFLOPS | 29.36 GFLOPS (1:64) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 844.8 GFLOPS | 1.879 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 384 | 640 |
| Pixel fill rate | 13.20 GPixel/s | 23.49 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 52.80 GTexel/s | 46.98 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 20 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3300 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Width | IGP | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 56.06 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1752 MHz (7008 MHz effective) | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 with others
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 555 OEM
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7550M
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7970M
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
NVIDIANVS 810
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
AMDRadeon Pro WX 4100
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)
