Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX vs AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX and AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- 2.1x more boost clock speed: 1650 MHz vs 780 MHz
- 4230.8x more texture fill rate: 79.20 GTexel/s vs 18.72 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 768 vs 384
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 28 nm
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 50 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 19% higher memory clock speed: 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective) vs 1800 MHz
- 2.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14127 vs 5904
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3462 vs 3341
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3462 vs 3341
- Around 78% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1972 vs 1110
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 31 Oct 2020 vs 30 June 2016 |
Boost clock speed | 1650 MHz vs 780 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 79.20 GTexel/s vs 18.72 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 768 vs 384 |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective) vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14127 vs 5904 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3462 vs 3341 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3462 vs 3341 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1972 vs 1110 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM
- 2.4x more core clock speed: 730 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 vs 3214
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 vs 3214
- Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 389 vs 311
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 730 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 vs 3214 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 3214 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 389 vs 311 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX | AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14127 | 5904 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6889 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6889 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3462 | 3341 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3462 | 3341 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3214 | 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3214 | 3355 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 311 | 389 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1972 | 1110 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX | AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.1 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | DG1 | Oland |
Launch date | 31 Oct 2020 | 30 June 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 520 | 672 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1650 MHz | 780 MHz |
Compute units | 96 | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 730 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 633.6 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 5.069 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.534 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 768 | 384 |
Pixel fill rate | 39.60 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 79.20 GTexel/s | 18.72 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 50 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 599.0 gflops | |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Width | IGP | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 68.26 GB/s | 28.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective) | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | DDR3 |