Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 11
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX and AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 33% higher boost clock speed: 1650 MHz vs 1240 MHz
- 1440x more texture fill rate: 79.20 GTexel/s vs 55 GTexel / s
- Around 9% higher pipelines: 768 vs 704
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 14 nm
- 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 65 Watt
- Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6889 vs 3455
- Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6889 vs 3455
- Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3462 vs 1857
- Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3462 vs 1857
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3214 vs 3107
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3214 vs 3107
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 31 Oct 2020 vs 13 February 2018 |
Boost clock speed | 1650 MHz vs 1240 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 79.20 GTexel/s vs 55 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 768 vs 704 |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6889 vs 3455 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6889 vs 3455 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3462 vs 1857 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3462 vs 1857 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3214 vs 3107 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3214 vs 3107 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 11
- Around 4% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14664 vs 14127
- Around 69% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 527 vs 311
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2120 vs 1972
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14664 vs 14127 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 527 vs 311 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2120 vs 1972 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX Vega 11
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX | AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14127 | 14664 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6889 | 3455 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6889 | 3455 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3462 | 1857 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3462 | 1857 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3214 | 3107 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3214 | 3107 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 311 | 527 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1972 | 2120 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 40.991 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 364.578 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.196 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 54.784 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 262.35 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1201 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX | AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.1 | GCN 5.0 |
Code name | DG1 | Raven |
Launch date | 31 Oct 2020 | 13 February 2018 |
Place in performance rating | 520 | 814 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1650 MHz | 1240 MHz |
Compute units | 96 | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 300 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 633.6 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 5.069 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.534 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 768 | 704 |
Pixel fill rate | 39.60 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 79.20 GTexel/s | 55 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 65 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 1,760 gflops | |
Transistor count | 4,940 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | IGP |
Width | IGP | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 68.26 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | |
Memory clock speed | 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective) | |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | |
Shared memory | 0 |