Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX vs Intel HD Graphics 4000
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX and Intel HD Graphics 4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 57% higher boost clock speed: 1650 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- 18857.1x more texture fill rate: 79.20 GTexel/s vs 4.2 GTexel / s
- 48x more pipelines: 768 vs 16
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 22 nm
- Around 80% lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 45 Watt
- 26.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14238 vs 538
- 9.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6889 vs 754
- 9.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6889 vs 754
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3462 vs 1492
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3462 vs 1492
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3214 vs 2392
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3214 vs 2392
- Around 60% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 311 vs 194
- 5.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1972 vs 347
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 31 Oct 2020 vs 14 May 2012 |
Boost clock speed | 1650 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 79.20 GTexel/s vs 4.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 768 vs 16 |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 22 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 45 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14238 vs 538 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6889 vs 754 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6889 vs 754 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3462 vs 1492 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3462 vs 1492 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3214 vs 2392 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3214 vs 2392 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 311 vs 194 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1972 vs 347 |
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4000
- 2.2x more core clock speed: 650 MHz vs 300 MHz
Core clock speed | 650 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4000
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX | Intel HD Graphics 4000 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14238 | 538 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6889 | 754 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6889 | 754 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3462 | 1492 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3462 | 1492 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3214 | 2392 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3214 | 2392 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 311 | 194 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1972 | 347 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.712 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 155.638 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.931 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 7.36 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 12.009 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX | Intel HD Graphics 4000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.1 | Generation 7.0 |
Code name | DG1 | Ivy Bridge GT2 |
Launch date | 31 Oct 2020 | 14 May 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 523 | 1501 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1650 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Compute units | 96 | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 650 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 22 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 633.6 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 5.069 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.534 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 768 | 16 |
Pixel fill rate | 39.60 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 79.20 GTexel/s | 4.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 45 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 33.6 gflops | |
Transistor count | 1,200 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Width | IGP | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 11.1 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.0 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 68.26 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective) | |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |