Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX and NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX

• Videocard is newer: launch date 13 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• 2357.1x more texture fill rate: 79.20 GTexel/s vs 33.6 billion / sec
• 6.9x more pipelines: 768 vs 112
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 65 nm
• 4.2x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 105 Watt
• 8x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 512 MB
• 2.4x more memory clock speed: 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective) vs 900 MHz
• 6.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 311 vs 49
• 4.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1972 vs 463

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT

• 5x more core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 300 MHz
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 vs 3214
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 vs 3214

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3214 3346
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3214 3346
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	311 49
PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1972 463

Compare specifications (specs)