Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 12 nm
| Launch date | 31 Oct 2020 vs 30 April 2019 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 12 nm |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- 5x more core clock speed: 1485 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 1% higher boost clock speed: 1665 MHz vs 1650 MHz
- 3.8x more memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective)
- 2.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 39165 vs 13655
- Around 59% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10959 vs 6889
- Around 59% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10959 vs 6889
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3462
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3462
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3214
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3214
- Around 84% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 571 vs 311
- 4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7872 vs 1972
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1485 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1665 MHz vs 1650 MHz |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz vs 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 39165 vs 13655 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10959 vs 6889 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10959 vs 6889 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 3462 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 3462 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3214 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3214 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 571 vs 311 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7872 vs 1972 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 13655 | 39165 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6889 | 10959 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6889 | 10959 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3462 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3462 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3214 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3214 | 3358 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 311 | 571 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1972 | 7872 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 135.146 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1315.075 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.799 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 93.209 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 570.245 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3585 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 12.1 | Turing |
| Code name | DG1 | TU107 |
| Launch date | 31 Oct 2020 | 30 April 2019 |
| Place in performance rating | 526 | 370 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $179 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1650 MHz | 1665 MHz |
| Compute units | 96 | |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1485 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 633.6 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 5.069 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.534 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 768 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 39.60 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 79.20 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort count | 1 | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Width | IGP | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 68.26 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective) | 8000 MHz |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX with others
IntelIris Xe Graphics MAX vs
NVIDIAGeForce PCX 5750
IntelIris Xe Graphics MAX vs
NVIDIAGeForce 8100 + nForce 720a
IntelIris Xe Graphics MAX vs
ATIRadeon HD 5830
IntelIris Xe Graphics MAX vs
ATIRadeon HD 4270
IntelIris Xe Graphics MAX vs
AMDFirePro M6000
IntelIris Xe Graphics MAX vs
NVIDIAQuadro M4000
