Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX and NVIDIA Quadro K5200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX

NVIDIA Quadro K5200

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX

Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 3 month(s) later
2.1x more boost clock speed: 1650 MHz vs 771 MHz
535.1x more texture fill rate: 79.20 GTexel/s vs 148.0 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 28 nm
6x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 150 Watt
Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6889 vs 5946
Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6889 vs 5946

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	31 Oct 2020 vs 22 July 2014
Boost clock speed	1650 MHz vs 771 MHz
Texture fill rate	79.20 GTexel/s vs 148.0 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	10 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	25 Watt vs 150 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	6889 vs 5946
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	6889 vs 5946

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K5200

2.2x more core clock speed: 667 MHz vs 300 MHz
3x more pipelines: 2304 vs 768
2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
2.8x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective)
Around 35% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 19220 vs 14238
Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3708 vs 3462
Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3708 vs 3462
Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 3214
Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 3214
Around 78% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 553 vs 311
3.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6135 vs 1972

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	667 MHz vs 300 MHz
Pipelines	2304 vs 768
Maximum memory size	8 GB vs 4 GB
Memory clock speed	6008 MHz vs 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective)
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	19220 vs 14238
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3708 vs 3462
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3708 vs 3462
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3353 vs 3214
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3353 vs 3214
PassMark - G2D Mark	553 vs 311
PassMark - G3D Mark	6135 vs 1972

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K5200

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

14238

19220

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6889

5946

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6889

5946

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3462

3708

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3462

3708

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3214

3353

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3214

3353

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

311

553

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1972

6135

Name	Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX	NVIDIA Quadro K5200
Geekbench - OpenCL	14238	19220
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	6889	5946
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	6889	5946
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3462	3708
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3462	3708
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3214	3353
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3214	3353
PassMark - G2D Mark	311	553
PassMark - G3D Mark	1972	6135
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		47.147
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		1278.433
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		3.996
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		50.08
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		115.307

Compare specifications (specs)

	Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX	NVIDIA Quadro K5200
Essentials
Architecture	Generation 12.1	Kepler
Code name	DG1	GK110B
Launch date	31 Oct 2020	22 July 2014
Place in performance rating	523	535
Type	Laptop	Workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$1,699.74
Price now		$523.66
Value for money (0-100)		14.51
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1650 MHz	771 MHz
Compute units	96
Core clock speed	300 MHz	667 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	10 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	633.6 GFLOPS (1:4)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	5.069 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	2.534 TFLOPS
Pipelines	768	2304
Pixel fill rate	39.60 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	79.20 GTexel/s	148.0 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	25 Watt	150 Watt
Floating-point performance		3,553 gflops
Transistor count		7,080 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x4	PCIe 3.0 x16
Width	IGP
Length		267 mm
Supplementary power connectors		1x 6-pin
API support
DirectX	12.1	12.0 (11_1)
OpenCL	2.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.4
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Memory bandwidth	68.26 GB/s	192.3 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective)	6008 MHz
Memory type	LPDDR4X	GDDR5