Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX vs NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX and NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX

NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX

Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 9 month(s) later
1811.5x more texture fill rate: 79.20 GTexel/s vs 43.72 GTexel / s
Around 20% higher pipelines: 768 vs 640
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 28 nm
Around 80% lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 45 Watt
Around 35% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14238 vs 10582
Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6889 vs 4941
Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6889 vs 4941
Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3462 vs 2645
Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3462 vs 2645

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	31 Oct 2020 vs 11 January 2017
Texture fill rate	79.20 GTexel/s vs 43.72 GTexel / s
Pipelines	768 vs 640
Manufacturing process technology	10 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	25 Watt vs 45 Watt
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	14238 vs 10582
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	6889 vs 4941
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	6889 vs 4941
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3462 vs 2645
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3462 vs 2645

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile

3.6x more core clock speed: 1093 MHz vs 300 MHz
2.3x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective)
Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 3214
Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 3214
Around 63% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3217 vs 1972

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1093 MHz vs 300 MHz
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz vs 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective)
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3359 vs 3214
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3359 vs 3214
PassMark - G2D Mark	312 vs 311
PassMark - G3D Mark	3217 vs 1972

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

14238

10582

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6889

4941

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6889

4941

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3462

2645

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3462

2645

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3214

3359

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3214

3359

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

311

312

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1972

3217

Name	Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX	NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile
Geekbench - OpenCL	14238	10582
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	6889	4941
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	6889	4941
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3462	2645
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3462	2645
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3214	3359
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3214	3359
PassMark - G2D Mark	311	312
PassMark - G3D Mark	1972	3217
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		52.821
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		793.297
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		3.631
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		48.966
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		163.204

Compare specifications (specs)

	Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX	NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile
Essentials
Architecture	Generation 12.1	Maxwell
Code name	DG1	GM107
Launch date	31 Oct 2020	11 January 2017
Place in performance rating	523	759
Type	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1650 MHz
Compute units	96
Core clock speed	300 MHz	1093 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	10 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	633.6 GFLOPS (1:4)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	5.069 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	2.534 TFLOPS
Pipelines	768	640
Pixel fill rate	39.60 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	79.20 GTexel/s	43.72 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	25 Watt	45 Watt
Floating-point performance		1,399 gflops
Transistor count		1,870 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x4	MXM-A (3.0)
Width	IGP
API support
DirectX	12.1	12.0 (11_0)
OpenCL	2.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.4
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	68.26 GB/s	80.19 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective)	5012 MHz
Memory type	LPDDR4X	GDDR5