Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX and NVIDIA Quadro M2000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX

Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 10 month(s) later
Around 50% higher boost clock speed: 1650 MHz vs 1098 MHz
1803.3x more texture fill rate: 79.20 GTexel/s vs 43.92 GTexel / s
Around 20% higher pipelines: 768 vs 640
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 28 nm
2.2x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 55 Watt
Around 75% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14238 vs 8148
Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6889 vs 4920
Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6889 vs 4920

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	31 Oct 2020 vs 3 December 2015
Boost clock speed	1650 MHz vs 1098 MHz
Texture fill rate	79.20 GTexel/s vs 43.92 GTexel / s
Pipelines	768 vs 640
Manufacturing process technology	10 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	25 Watt vs 55 Watt
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	14238 vs 8148
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	6889 vs 4920
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	6889 vs 4920

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

3.4x more core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 300 MHz
2.3x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective)
Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3462
Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3462
Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 vs 3214
Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 vs 3214
Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 336 vs 311
Around 75% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3446 vs 1972

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1029 MHz vs 300 MHz
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz vs 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective)
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3715 vs 3462
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3715 vs 3462
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3355 vs 3214
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3355 vs 3214
PassMark - G2D Mark	336 vs 311
PassMark - G3D Mark	3446 vs 1972

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

14238

8148

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6889

4920

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6889

4920

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3462

3715

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3462

3715

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3214

3355

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3214

3355

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

311

336

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1972

3446

Name	Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX	NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
Geekbench - OpenCL	14238	8148
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	6889	4920
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	6889	4920
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3462	3715
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3462	3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3214	3355
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3214	3355
PassMark - G2D Mark	311	336
PassMark - G3D Mark	1972	3446
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		47.281
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		782.113
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		3.5
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		51.048
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		172.896

Compare specifications (specs)

	Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX	NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
Essentials
Architecture	Generation 12.1	Maxwell
Code name	DG1	GM107
Launch date	31 Oct 2020	3 December 2015
Place in performance rating	523	700
Type	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1650 MHz	1098 MHz
Compute units	96
Core clock speed	300 MHz	1029 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	10 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	633.6 GFLOPS (1:4)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	5.069 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	2.534 TFLOPS
Pipelines	768	640
Pixel fill rate	39.60 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	79.20 GTexel/s	43.92 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	25 Watt	55 Watt
Floating-point performance		1,405 gflops
Transistor count		1,870 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Display Port		1.2
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x4	MXM-A (3.0)
Width	IGP
Laptop size		large
Supplementary power connectors		None
API support
DirectX	12.1	12
OpenCL	2.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model	6.4	5.0
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	68.26 GB/s	80 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective)	5012 MHz
Memory type	LPDDR4X	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus