Intel UHD Graphics 600 vs Intel HD Graphics 5500
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 600 and Intel HD Graphics 5500 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 600
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 2x more core clock speed: 200 MHz vs 100 MHz
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 5 Watt vs 15 Watt
- Around 74% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 5.952 vs 3.422
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1000 vs 754
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1701 vs 1397
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1000 vs 754
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1701 vs 1397
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 11 December 2017 vs 5 September 2014 |
| Core clock speed | 200 MHz vs 100 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 5 Watt vs 15 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.952 vs 3.422 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1000 vs 754 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1701 vs 1397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1000 vs 754 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1701 vs 1397 |
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 5500
- Around 27% higher boost clock speed: 950 MHz vs 750 MHz
- 2x more pipelines: 24 vs 12
- Around 87% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 594 vs 318
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 230 vs 92
- 2.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2262 vs 1004
- 3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 195.811 vs 56.77
- Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 781 vs 476
- Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 781 vs 476
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Boost clock speed | 950 MHz vs 750 MHz |
| Pipelines | 24 vs 12 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 594 vs 318 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 230 vs 92 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2262 vs 1004 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 195.811 vs 56.77 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 781 vs 476 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 781 vs 476 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 600
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 5500
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel UHD Graphics 600 | Intel HD Graphics 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 318 | 594 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 92 | 230 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1004 | 2262 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.952 | 3.422 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 56.77 | 195.811 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.427 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 5.876 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 6.882 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 476 | 781 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1000 | 754 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1701 | 1397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 476 | 781 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1000 | 754 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1701 | 1397 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 233 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel UHD Graphics 600 | Intel HD Graphics 5500 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Generation 8.0 |
| Code name | Gemini Lake GT1 | Broadwell GT2 |
| Launch date | 11 December 2017 | 5 September 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 1624 | 1478 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 750 MHz | 950 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 200 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 12 | 24 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 5 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 1,300 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x1 |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
| Memory type | DDR4 / LPDDR4 | |
| Shared memory | 1 | 1 |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel UHD Graphics 600 with others
IntelUHD Graphics 600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7500 LE
IntelUHD Graphics 600 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 1500
IntelUHD Graphics 600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 8600 GT
IntelUHD Graphics 600 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6450
IntelUHD Graphics 600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 610
IntelUHD Graphics 600 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8250
