Intel UHD Graphics 600 versus Intel HD Graphics 5500
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics 600 and Intel HD Graphics 5500 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 600
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 3 mois plus tard
- 2x plus de vitesse du noyau: 200 MHz versus 100 MHz
- 3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 5 Watt versus 15 Watt
- Environ 74% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 5.952 versus 3.422
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1000 versus 754
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1701 versus 1397
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1000 versus 754
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1701 versus 1397
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 11 December 2017 versus 5 September 2014 |
Vitesse du noyau | 200 MHz versus 100 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 5 Watt versus 15 Watt |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.952 versus 3.422 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1000 versus 754 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1701 versus 1397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1000 versus 754 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1701 versus 1397 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 5500
- Environ 27% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 950 MHz versus 750 MHz
- 2x plus de pipelines: 24 versus 12
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 594 versus 318
- 2.5x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 230 versus 92
- 2.3x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 2262 versus 1004
- 3.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 195.811 versus 56.77
- Environ 64% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 781 versus 476
- Environ 64% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 781 versus 476
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse augmenté | 950 MHz versus 750 MHz |
Pipelines | 24 versus 12 |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 594 versus 318 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 230 versus 92 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2262 versus 1004 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 195.811 versus 56.77 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 781 versus 476 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 781 versus 476 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 600
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 5500
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | Intel UHD Graphics 600 | Intel HD Graphics 5500 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 318 | 594 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 92 | 230 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1004 | 2262 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.952 | 3.422 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 56.77 | 195.811 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.427 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 5.876 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 6.882 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 476 | 781 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1000 | 754 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1701 | 1397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 476 | 781 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1000 | 754 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1701 | 1397 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 233 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
Intel UHD Graphics 600 | Intel HD Graphics 5500 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Generation 8.0 |
Nom de code | Gemini Lake GT1 | Broadwell GT2 |
Date de sortie | 11 December 2017 | 5 September 2014 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1624 | 1478 |
Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 750 MHz | 950 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 200 MHz | 100 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 12 | 24 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 5 Watt | 15 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 189 million | 1,300 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x1 |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
Genre de mémoire | DDR4 / LPDDR4 | |
Mémoire partagé | 1 | 1 |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |