Intel UHD Graphics 600 vs Intel UHD Graphics 620

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 600 and Intel UHD Graphics 620 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

Intel UHD Graphics 600

Intel UHD Graphics 620

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 600

Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
3x lower typical power consumption: 5 Watt vs 15 Watt
Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1000 vs 878
Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1000 vs 878

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	11 December 2017 vs 1 September 2017
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	5 Watt vs 15 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1000 vs 878
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1000 vs 878

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 620

Around 50% higher core clock speed: 300 MHz vs 200 MHz
Around 53% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 750 MHz
2x more pipelines: 24 vs 12
3.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1042 vs 318
2.6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 241 vs 92
4.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4592 vs 1004
4.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.062 vs 5.952
4.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 273.504 vs 56.77
4.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.777 vs 0.427
3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.939 vs 5.876
4.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 31.881 vs 6.882
2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1397 vs 476
Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2227 vs 1701
2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1397 vs 476
Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2227 vs 1701

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	300 MHz vs 200 MHz
Boost clock speed	1150 MHz vs 750 MHz
Pipelines	24 vs 12
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	1042 vs 318
PassMark - G2D Mark	241 vs 92
Geekbench - OpenCL	4592 vs 1004
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	27.062 vs 5.952
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	273.504 vs 56.77
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.777 vs 0.427
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	19.939 vs 5.876
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	31.881 vs 6.882
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1397 vs 476
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2227 vs 1701
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1397 vs 476
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2227 vs 1701

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 600
GPU 2: Intel UHD Graphics 620

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

318

1042

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

241

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

1004

4592

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

5.952

27.062

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

56.77

273.504

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

0.427

1.777

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

5.876

19.939

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6.882

31.881

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

476

1397

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1000

878

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1701

2227

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

476

1397

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1000

878

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1701

2227

Name	Intel UHD Graphics 600	Intel UHD Graphics 620
PassMark - G3D Mark	318	1042
PassMark - G2D Mark	92	241
Geekbench - OpenCL	1004	4592
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	5.952	27.062
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	56.77	273.504
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.427	1.777
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	5.876	19.939
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	6.882	31.881
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	476	1397
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1000	878
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1701	2227
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	476	1397
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1000	878
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1701	2227
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	0	62

Compare specifications (specs)

	Intel UHD Graphics 600	Intel UHD Graphics 620
Essentials
Architecture	Generation 9.5	Generation 9.5
Code name	Gemini Lake GT1	Kaby Lake GT2
Launch date	11 December 2017	1 September 2017
Place in performance rating	1624	1380
Type	Laptop	Laptop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	750 MHz	1150 MHz
Core clock speed	200 MHz	300 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	14 nm
Pipelines	12	24
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	5 Watt	15 Watt
Transistor count	189 million	189 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x1	PCIe 3.0 x1
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	12.0 (12_1)
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
Memory
Memory bus width	64 / 128 Bit	64 / 128 Bit
Memory type	DDR4 / LPDDR4	LPDDR3 / DDR4
Shared memory	1	1
Maximum RAM amount		32 GB
Technologies
Quick Sync