Intel UHD Graphics 600 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 620

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 600 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 600

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
• 9.8x lower typical power consumption: 5 Watt vs 49 Watt
• Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 5.952 vs 4.046
• Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.427 vs 0.371
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1701 vs 1683
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1701 vs 1683

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 620

• 3.5x more core clock speed: 700 MHz vs 200 MHz
• 8x more pipelines: 96 vs 12
• Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 383 vs 318
• Around 72% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 158 vs 92
• Around 56% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1571 vs 1004
• Around 48% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 83.907 vs 56.77
• Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 6.791 vs 5.876
• 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 17.41 vs 6.882
• Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 614 vs 476
• Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1162 vs 1000
• Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 614 vs 476
• Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1162 vs 1000

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 600
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 620

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	318 383
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	92 158
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	1004 1571
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5.952 4.046
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	56.77 83.907
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.427 0.371
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5.876 6.791
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6.882 17.41
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	476 614
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1000 1162
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1701 1683
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	476 614
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1000 1162
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1701 1683

Compare specifications (specs)