Intel UHD Graphics 610 vs AMD Radeon 520
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 610 and AMD Radeon 520 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 610
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
- Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 1030 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 50 Watt
| Launch date | 3 April 2018 vs 18 April 2017 |
| Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz vs 1030 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 520
- 3.4x more core clock speed: 1030 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 865 vs 693
- Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 203 vs 171
- 9.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 26304 vs 2697
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1182 vs 1071
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1182 vs 1071
- Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 vs 1699
- Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 vs 1699
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1030 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 865 vs 693 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 203 vs 171 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 26304 vs 2697 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1182 vs 1071 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1182 vs 1071 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1242 vs 1241 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1242 vs 1241 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 vs 1699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 vs 1699 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 610
GPU 2: AMD Radeon 520
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel UHD Graphics 610 | AMD Radeon 520 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 693 | 865 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 171 | 203 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2697 | 26304 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1071 | 1182 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1071 | 1182 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1241 | 1242 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1241 | 1242 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1699 | 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1699 | 3351 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel UHD Graphics 610 | AMD Radeon 520 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Coffee Lake GT1 | Oland |
| Launch date | 3 April 2018 | 18 April 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 1350 | 1109 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop, Laptop |
| Design | Radeon 500 Series | |
| GCN generation | 1st Gen | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | 1030 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1030 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 1,040 million |
| Compute units | 5 | |
| Floating-point performance | 660 GFLOPs | |
| Pipelines | 320 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 4.10 GP/s | |
| Render output units | 4 | |
| Stream Processors | 320 | |
| Texture fill rate | 20.60 GTexel/s | |
| Texture Units | 20 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 48 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Graphics Core Next (GCN) Architecture | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| Enduro | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TressFX | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel UHD Graphics 610 with others
IntelUHD Graphics 610 vs
ATIMobility Radeon 9000
IntelUHD Graphics 610 vs
ATIMobility Radeon 9800
IntelUHD Graphics 610 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 570M
IntelUHD Graphics 610 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640M
IntelUHD Graphics 610 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8400 IGP
IntelUHD Graphics 610 vs
AMDRadeon 660M
