Intel UHD Graphics 610 vs Intel HD Graphics 4000

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 610 and Intel HD Graphics 4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

Intel UHD Graphics 610

Intel HD Graphics 4000

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 610

Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 10 month(s) later
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 22 nm
3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 45 Watt
2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 693 vs 347
5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2697 vs 538
Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1071 vs 754
Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1071 vs 754

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	3 April 2018 vs 14 May 2012
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 22 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt vs 45 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	693 vs 347
Geekbench - OpenCL	2697 vs 538
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1071 vs 754
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1071 vs 754

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4000

2.2x more core clock speed: 650 MHz vs 300 MHz
Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 194 vs 171
Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1492 vs 1241
Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1492 vs 1241
Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2392 vs 1699
Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2392 vs 1699

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	650 MHz vs 300 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	194 vs 171
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1492 vs 1241
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1492 vs 1241
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2392 vs 1699
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2392 vs 1699

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 610
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4000

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

693

347

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

171

194

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

2697

538

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1071

754

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1071

754

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1241

1492

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1241

1492

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1699

2392

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1699

2392

Name	Intel UHD Graphics 610	Intel HD Graphics 4000
PassMark - G3D Mark	693	347
PassMark - G2D Mark	171	194
Geekbench - OpenCL	2697	538
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1071	754
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1071	754
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1241	1492
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1241	1492
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1699	2392
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1699	2392
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		8.712
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		155.638
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		0.931
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		7.36
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		12.009
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		0

Compare specifications (specs)

	Intel UHD Graphics 610	Intel HD Graphics 4000
Essentials
Architecture	Generation 9.5	Generation 7.0
Code name	Coffee Lake GT1	Ivy Bridge GT2
Launch date	3 April 2018	14 May 2012
Place in performance rating	1350	1501
Type	Desktop	Laptop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1050 MHz	1050 MHz
Core clock speed	300 MHz	650 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	22 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt	45 Watt
Transistor count	189 million	1,200 million
Floating-point performance		33.6 gflops
Pipelines		16
Texture fill rate		4.2 GTexel / s
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x1	PCIe 1.0 x16
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	11.1 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.6	4.0
Memory
Memory bus width		64 / 128 Bit
Shared memory		1
Technologies
Quick Sync