Intel UHD Graphics 610 versus Intel HD Graphics 4000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics 610 and Intel HD Graphics 4000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 610
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 ans 10 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 22 nm
- 3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 45 Watt
- 2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 693 versus 347
- 5x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 2697 versus 538
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1071 versus 754
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1071 versus 754
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 3 April 2018 versus 14 May 2012 |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 22 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 45 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 693 versus 347 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2697 versus 538 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1071 versus 754 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1071 versus 754 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 4000
- 2.2x plus de vitesse du noyau: 650 MHz versus 300 MHz
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 194 versus 171
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1492 versus 1241
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1492 versus 1241
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2392 versus 1699
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2392 versus 1699
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 650 MHz versus 300 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 194 versus 171 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1492 versus 1241 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1492 versus 1241 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2392 versus 1699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2392 versus 1699 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 610
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel UHD Graphics 610 | Intel HD Graphics 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 693 | 347 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 171 | 194 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2697 | 538 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1071 | 754 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1071 | 754 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1241 | 1492 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1241 | 1492 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1699 | 2392 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1699 | 2392 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.712 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 155.638 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.931 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 7.36 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 12.009 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel UHD Graphics 610 | Intel HD Graphics 4000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Generation 7.0 |
| Nom de code | Coffee Lake GT1 | Ivy Bridge GT2 |
| Date de sortie | 3 April 2018 | 14 May 2012 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1350 | 1501 |
| Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1050 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 22 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 189 million | 1,200 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 33.6 gflops | |
| Pipelines | 16 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 4.2 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 11.1 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.0 |
Mémoire |
||
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel UHD Graphics 610 avec des autres
IntelUHD Graphics 610 vs
ATIMobility Radeon 9000
IntelUHD Graphics 610 vs
ATIMobility Radeon 9800
IntelUHD Graphics 610 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 570M
IntelUHD Graphics 610 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640M
IntelUHD Graphics 610 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8400 IGP
IntelUHD Graphics 610 vs
AMDRadeon 660M
