Intel UHD Graphics 615 vs Intel HD Graphics 4400

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 615 and Intel HD Graphics 4400 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 615

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• 5478.3x more texture fill rate: 25.2 GTexel/s vs 4.6 GTexel / s
• Around 20% higher pipelines: 24 vs 20
• 8.8x better floating-point performance: 403.2 gflops vs 46 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 22 nm
• 4x lower typical power consumption: 5 Watt vs 20 Watt
• Around 40% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 730 vs 523
• Around 51% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3229 vs 2144
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 18.422 vs 7.844
• Around 43% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 221.42 vs 154.696
• Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.277 vs 0.958
• Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 12.269 vs 9.084
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 18.909 vs 8.335
• Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1256 vs 817
• Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1720 vs 1381
• Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1256 vs 817
• Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1720 vs 1381

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4400

• Around 17% higher core clock speed: 350 MHz vs 300 MHz
• Around 10% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 1050 MHz
• Around 54% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 277 vs 180
• Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3044 vs 1772
• Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3044 vs 1772

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 615
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4400

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	730 523
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	180 277
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	3229 2144
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	18.422 7.844
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	221.42 154.696
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.277 0.958
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12.269 9.084
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	18.909 8.335
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1256 817
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1720 1381
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1772 3044
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1256 817
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1720 1381
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1772 3044

Compare specifications (specs)