Intel UHD Graphics 615 versus Intel HD Graphics 520
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics 615 and Intel HD Graphics 520 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 615
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 2 mois plus tard
- 3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 5 Watt versus 15 Watt
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 221.42 versus 143.083
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.34 versus 1.243
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1256 versus 951
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1720 versus 1462
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1256 versus 951
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1720 versus 1462
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 7 November 2018 versus 1 September 2015 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 5 Watt versus 15 Watt |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 221.42 versus 143.083 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.34 versus 1.243 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1256 versus 951 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1720 versus 1462 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1256 versus 951 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1720 versus 1462 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 520
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 32 GB versus 16 GB
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 868 versus 740
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 211 versus 185
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 4014 versus 3241
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 21.852 versus 18.583
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 12.958 versus 12.269
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 28.182 versus 23.383
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3337 versus 1772
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3337 versus 1772
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 32 GB versus 16 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 868 versus 740 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 211 versus 185 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4014 versus 3241 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.852 versus 18.583 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.958 versus 12.269 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 28.182 versus 23.383 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3337 versus 1772 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3337 versus 1772 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 615
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 520
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel UHD Graphics 615 | Intel HD Graphics 520 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 740 | 868 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 185 | 211 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3241 | 4014 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.583 | 21.852 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 221.42 | 143.083 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.34 | 1.243 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.269 | 12.958 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.383 | 28.182 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1256 | 951 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1720 | 1462 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1772 | 3337 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1256 | 951 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1720 | 1462 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1772 | 3337 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 326 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel UHD Graphics 615 | Intel HD Graphics 520 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Generation 9.0 |
| Nom de code | Kaby Lake GT2 | Skylake GT2 |
| Date de sortie | 7 November 2018 | 1 September 2015 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1390 | 1391 |
| Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1050 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 403.2 gflops | |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 100.8 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 806.4 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 403.2 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 24 | 24 |
| Pixel fill rate | 3.150 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 25.2 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 5 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 189 million | 189 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 16 GB | 32 GB |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3L / LPDDR3 | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 |
| Mémoire partagé | Yes | 1 |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel UHD Graphics 615 avec des autres
IntelUHD Graphics 615 vs
ATIRadeon HD 3870
IntelUHD Graphics 615 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9600 GSO
IntelUHD Graphics 615 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 260
IntelUHD Graphics 615 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M340
IntelUHD Graphics 615 vs
AMDRadeon R5 M320
IntelUHD Graphics 615 vs
IntelHD Graphics 520
