Intel UHD Graphics 617 vs NVIDIA GeForce 930M

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 617 and NVIDIA GeForce 930M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 617

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 7 month(s) later
  • Around 12% higher boost clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 941 MHz
  • 1116x more texture fill rate: 25.20 GTexel/s vs 22.58 GTexel / s
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 33 Watt
  • Around 55% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 232 vs 150
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 7 November 2018 vs 13 March 2015
Boost clock speed 1050 MHz vs 941 MHz
Texture fill rate 25.20 GTexel/s vs 22.58 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 33 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 232 vs 150

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 930M

  • 3.1x more core clock speed: 928 MHz vs 300 MHz
  • 16x more pipelines: 384 vs 24
  • Around 55% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5084 vs 3290
  • Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1987 vs 1313
  • Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1987 vs 1313
  • 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3706 vs 1461
  • 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3706 vs 1461
  • 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 1633
  • 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 1633
  • Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1012 vs 874
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 928 MHz vs 300 MHz
Pipelines 384 vs 24
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 5084 vs 3290
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1987 vs 1313
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1987 vs 1313
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3706 vs 1461
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3706 vs 1461
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3356 vs 1633
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3356 vs 1633
PassMark - G3D Mark 1012 vs 874

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 617
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 930M

Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
3290
5084
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1313
1987
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1313
1987
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1461
3706
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1461
3706
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1633
3356
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1633
3356
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
232
150
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
874
1012
Name Intel UHD Graphics 617 NVIDIA GeForce 930M
Geekbench - OpenCL 3290 5084
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1313 1987
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1313 1987
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1461 3706
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1461 3706
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1633 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1633 3356
PassMark - G2D Mark 232 150
PassMark - G3D Mark 874 1012
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 22.344
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 166.907
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.225
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 19.899
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 84.246
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 0

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel UHD Graphics 617 NVIDIA GeForce 930M

Essentials

Architecture Generation 9.5 Maxwell
Code name Amber Lake GT2 GM108
Launch date 7 November 2018 13 March 2015
Place in performance rating 1223 1226
Type Laptop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1050 MHz 941 MHz
Core clock speed 300 MHz 928 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 100.8 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 806.4 GFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 403.2 GFLOPS
Pipelines 24 384
Pixel fill rate 3.150 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 25.20 GTexel/s 22.58 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 33 Watt
Floating-point performance 722.7 gflops

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x1 PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus support PCI Express 3.0
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12 12.0 (11_0)
OpenCL 2.1
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
Shader Model 6.4
Vulkan

Memory

Memory bus width 64 / 128 Bit 64 Bit
Memory type DDR3L / LPDDR3 DDR3
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 14.4 GB / s
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz
Shared memory 0

Technologies

CUDA
GameWorks
GeForce Experience
GPU Boost
Optimus