Intel UHD Graphics 617 vs NVIDIA GeForce 930M

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 617 and NVIDIA GeForce 930M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

Intel UHD Graphics 617

NVIDIA GeForce 930M

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 617

Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 7 month(s) later
Around 12% higher boost clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 941 MHz
1116x more texture fill rate: 25.20 GTexel/s vs 22.58 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
2.2x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 33 Watt
Around 54% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 232 vs 151

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	7 November 2018 vs 13 March 2015
Boost clock speed	1050 MHz vs 941 MHz
Texture fill rate	25.20 GTexel/s vs 22.58 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt vs 33 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	232 vs 151

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 930M

3.1x more core clock speed: 928 MHz vs 300 MHz
16x more pipelines: 384 vs 24
Around 54% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5074 vs 3288
Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1987 vs 1313
Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1987 vs 1313
2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3706 vs 1461
2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3706 vs 1461
2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 1633
2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 1633
Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1013 vs 874

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	928 MHz vs 300 MHz
Pipelines	384 vs 24
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	5074 vs 3288
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1987 vs 1313
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1987 vs 1313
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3706 vs 1461
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3706 vs 1461
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3356 vs 1633
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3356 vs 1633
PassMark - G3D Mark	1013 vs 874

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 617
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 930M

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

3288

5074

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1313

1987

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1313

1987

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1461

3706

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1461

3706

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1633

3356

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1633

3356

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

232

151

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

874

1013

Name	Intel UHD Graphics 617	NVIDIA GeForce 930M
Geekbench - OpenCL	3288	5074
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1313	1987
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1313	1987
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1461	3706
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1461	3706
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1633	3356
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1633	3356
PassMark - G2D Mark	232	151
PassMark - G3D Mark	874	1013
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		22.344
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		166.907
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		1.225
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		19.899
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		84.246
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		0

Compare specifications (specs)

	Intel UHD Graphics 617	NVIDIA GeForce 930M
Essentials
Architecture	Generation 9.5	Maxwell
Code name	Amber Lake GT2	GM108
Launch date	7 November 2018	13 March 2015
Place in performance rating	1225	1226
Type	Laptop	Laptop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1050 MHz	941 MHz
Core clock speed	300 MHz	928 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	100.8 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	806.4 GFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	403.2 GFLOPS
Pipelines	24	384
Pixel fill rate	3.150 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	25.20 GTexel/s	22.58 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt	33 Watt
Floating-point performance		722.7 gflops
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x1	PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus support		PCI Express 3.0
Supplementary power connectors		None
API support
DirectX	12	12.0 (11_0)
OpenCL	2.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model	6.4
Vulkan
Memory
Memory bus width	64 / 128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory type	DDR3L / LPDDR3	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount		2 GB
Memory bandwidth		14.4 GB / s
Memory clock speed		1800 MHz
Shared memory		0
Technologies
CUDA
GameWorks
GeForce Experience
GPU Boost
Optimus