Intel UHD Graphics 617 vs NVIDIA GeForce 830M

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 617 and NVIDIA GeForce 830M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 617

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 7 month(s) later
  • 1369.6x more texture fill rate: 25.20 GTexel/s vs 18.4 GTexel / s
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 33 Watt
  • Around 71% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 232 vs 136
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 7 November 2018 vs 12 March 2014
Texture fill rate 25.20 GTexel/s vs 18.4 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 33 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 232 vs 136

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 830M

  • 3.6x more core clock speed: 1082 MHz vs 300 MHz
  • Around 10% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 1050 MHz
  • 10.7x more pipelines: 256 vs 24
  • Around 27% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4160 vs 3288
  • Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1729 vs 1313
  • Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1729 vs 1313
  • 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3589 vs 1461
  • 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3589 vs 1461
  • 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3352 vs 1633
  • 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 vs 1633
  • Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1008 vs 874
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1082 MHz vs 300 MHz
Boost clock speed 1150 MHz vs 1050 MHz
Pipelines 256 vs 24
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 4160 vs 3288
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1729 vs 1313
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1729 vs 1313
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3589 vs 1461
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3589 vs 1461
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3352 vs 1633
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3352 vs 1633
PassMark - G3D Mark 1008 vs 874

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 617
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 830M

Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
3288
4160
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1313
1729
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1313
1729
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1461
3589
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1461
3589
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1633
3352
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1633
3352
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
232
136
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
874
1008
Name Intel UHD Graphics 617 NVIDIA GeForce 830M
Geekbench - OpenCL 3288 4160
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1313 1729
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1313 1729
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1461 3589
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1461 3589
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1633 3352
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1633 3352
PassMark - G2D Mark 232 136
PassMark - G3D Mark 874 1008
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 16.955
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 156.544
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.013
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 17.81
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 67.443

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel UHD Graphics 617 NVIDIA GeForce 830M

Essentials

Architecture Generation 9.5 Maxwell
Code name Amber Lake GT2 GM108
Launch date 7 November 2018 12 March 2014
Place in performance rating 1225 1228
Type Laptop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1050 MHz 1150 MHz
Core clock speed 300 MHz 1082 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 100.8 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 806.4 GFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 403.2 GFLOPS
Pipelines 24 256
Pixel fill rate 3.150 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 25.20 GTexel/s 18.4 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 33 Watt
Floating-point performance 588.8 gflops

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x1 PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus support PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0

API support

DirectX 12 12.0 (11_0)
OpenCL 2.1
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
Shader Model 6.4
Vulkan

Memory

Memory bus width 64 / 128 Bit 64 Bit
Memory type DDR3L / LPDDR3 DDR3
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 14.4 GB / s
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz
Shared memory 0

Technologies

CUDA
GameWorks
GPU Boost
Optimus