Intel UHD Graphics 617 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 617 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

Intel UHD Graphics 617

NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 617

Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 9 month(s) later
Around 9% higher boost clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 967 MHz
814.5x more texture fill rate: 25.20 GTexel/s vs 30.94 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
3.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 50 Watt

Launch date	7 November 2018 vs 9 January 2013
Boost clock speed	1050 MHz vs 967 MHz
Texture fill rate	25.20 GTexel/s vs 30.94 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt vs 50 Watt

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M

3.1x more core clock speed: 941 MHz vs 300 MHz
16x more pipelines: 384 vs 24
Around 29% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4267 vs 3300
Around 79% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2351 vs 1313
Around 79% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2351 vs 1313
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3520 vs 1461
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3520 vs 1461
2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3334 vs 1633
2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3334 vs 1633
Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 244 vs 230
Around 55% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1330 vs 856

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	941 MHz vs 300 MHz
Pipelines	384 vs 24
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	4267 vs 3300
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2351 vs 1313
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2351 vs 1313
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3520 vs 1461
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3520 vs 1461
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3334 vs 1633
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3334 vs 1633
PassMark - G2D Mark	244 vs 230
PassMark - G3D Mark	1330 vs 856

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 617
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

3300

4267

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1313

2351

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1313

2351

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1461

3520

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1461

3520

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1633

3334

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1633

3334

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

230

244

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

856

1330

Name	Intel UHD Graphics 617	NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M
Geekbench - OpenCL	3300	4267
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1313	2351
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1313	2351
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1461	3520
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1461	3520
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1633	3334
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1633	3334
PassMark - G2D Mark	230	244
PassMark - G3D Mark	856	1330
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		15.67
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		251.09
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		1.144
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		10.872
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		13.423
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		461

Compare specifications (specs)

	Intel UHD Graphics 617	NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M
Essentials
Architecture	Generation 9.5	Kepler
Code name	Amber Lake GT2	GK107
Launch date	7 November 2018	9 January 2013
Place in performance rating	1233	1141
Type	Laptop	Laptop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1050 MHz	967 MHz
Core clock speed	300 MHz	941 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	100.8 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	806.4 GFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	403.2 GFLOPS
Pipelines	24	384
Pixel fill rate	3.150 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	25.20 GTexel/s	30.94 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt	50 Watt
Floating-point performance		742.7 gflops
Transistor count		1,270 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support		Up to 3840x2160
eDP 1.2 signal support		Up to 3840x2160
HDCP content protection
HDMI
LVDS signal support		Up to 1920x1200
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming
VGA аnalog display support		Up to 2048x1536
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x1	PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus support		PCI Express 3.0
Laptop size		medium sized
API support
DirectX	12	12 API
OpenCL	2.1	1.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model	6.4
Vulkan
Memory
Memory bus width	64 / 128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory type	DDR3L / LPDDR3	DDR3, GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount		2 GB
Memory bandwidth		64.19 GB / s
Memory clock speed		4012 MHz
Shared memory		0
Standard memory configuration		DDR3 / GDDR5
Technologies
3D Vision
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
Blu-Ray 3D Support
CUDA
Direct Compute
FXAA
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
Optimus