Intel UHD Graphics 617 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics 617 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 617
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 ans 9 mois plus tard
- Environ 9% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1050 MHz versus 967 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 25.20 GTexel/s versus 30.94 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 3.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 50 Watt
| Date de sortie | 7 November 2018 versus 9 January 2013 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1050 MHz versus 967 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 25.20 GTexel/s versus 30.94 GTexel / s |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 50 Watt |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M
- 3.1x plus de vitesse du noyau: 941 MHz versus 300 MHz
- 16x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 24
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 4267 versus 3300
- Environ 79% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2351 versus 1313
- Environ 79% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2351 versus 1313
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3520 versus 1461
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3520 versus 1461
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3334 versus 1633
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3334 versus 1633
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 244 versus 230
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1330 versus 856
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 941 MHz versus 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 384 versus 24 |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4267 versus 3300 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2351 versus 1313 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2351 versus 1313 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3520 versus 1461 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3520 versus 1461 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3334 versus 1633 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3334 versus 1633 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 244 versus 230 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1330 versus 856 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 617
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Nom | Intel UHD Graphics 617 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3300 | 4267 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1313 | 2351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1313 | 2351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1461 | 3520 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1461 | 3520 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1633 | 3334 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1633 | 3334 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 230 | 244 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 856 | 1330 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.67 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 251.09 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.144 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.872 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 13.423 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 461 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel UHD Graphics 617 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | Amber Lake GT2 | GK107 |
| Date de sortie | 7 November 2018 | 9 January 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1233 | 1141 |
| Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1050 MHz | 967 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 941 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 100.8 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 806.4 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 403.2 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 24 | 384 |
| Pixel fill rate | 3.150 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 25.20 GTexel/s | 30.94 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Performance á point flottant | 742.7 gflops | |
| Compte de transistor | 1,270 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 API |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3L / LPDDR3 | DDR3, GDDR5 |
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 64.19 GB / s | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4012 MHz | |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
| Configuration standard de la mémoire | DDR3 / GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel UHD Graphics 617 avec des autres
IntelUHD Graphics 617 vs
ATIRadeon 9200 PRO
IntelUHD Graphics 617 vs
ATIRadeon 9200
IntelUHD Graphics 617 vs
AMDRadeon R7 240
IntelUHD Graphics 617 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 840M
IntelUHD Graphics 617 vs
IntelUHD Graphics 630
IntelUHD Graphics 617 vs
AMDRadeon 680M
