Intel UHD Graphics 620 vs AMD Radeon R5 M230

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 620 and AMD Radeon R5 M230 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 620

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• Around 35% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 855 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 8x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 4 GB
• 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1042 vs 417
• Around 88% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 241 vs 128
• 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.062 vs 8.593
• Around 91% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 273.504 vs 143.386
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.777 vs 0.852
• Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.939 vs 15.789
• Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1397 vs 985
• Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1397 vs 985

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M230

• 2.8x more core clock speed: 825 MHz vs 300 MHz
• 13.3x more pipelines: 320 vs 24
• Around 54% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 49.196 vs 31.881
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1927 vs 878
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2401 vs 2227
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1927 vs 878
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2401 vs 2227

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 620
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 M230

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1042 417
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	241 128
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4592 4596
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.062 8.593
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	273.504 143.386
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.777 0.852
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19.939 15.789
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	31.881 49.196
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1397 985
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	878 1927
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2227 2401
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1397 985
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	878 1927
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2227 2401

Compare specifications (specs)