Intel UHD Graphics 620 vs AMD Radeon R7 M460

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 620 and AMD Radeon R7 M460 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 620

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 1125 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 16x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 241 vs 198
• Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.062 vs 19.679
• Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.777 vs 1.572

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M460

• 3.7x more core clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 300 MHz
• 16x more pipelines: 384 vs 24
• Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1054 vs 1042
• Around 9% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4999 vs 4592
• Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 358.673 vs 273.504
• Around 51% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.024 vs 19.939
• 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 85.168 vs 31.881
• Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2294 vs 1397
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1767 vs 878
• Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2772 vs 2227
• Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2294 vs 1397
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1767 vs 878
• Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2772 vs 2227

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 620
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 M460

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1042 1054
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	241 198
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4592 4999
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.062 19.679
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	273.504 358.673
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.777 1.572
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19.939 30.024
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	31.881 85.168
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1397 2294
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	878 1767
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2227 2772
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1397 2294
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	878 1767
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2227 2772

Compare specifications (specs)