Intel UHD Graphics 620 vs Intel HD Graphics 4400

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 620 and Intel HD Graphics 4400 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 620

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• Around 20% higher pipelines: 24 vs 20
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 22 nm
• Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 20 Watt
• Around 99% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1042 vs 524
• 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4592 vs 2143
• 3.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.062 vs 7.844
• Around 77% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 273.504 vs 154.696
• Around 85% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.777 vs 0.958
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.939 vs 9.084
• 3.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 31.881 vs 8.335
• Around 71% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1397 vs 817
• Around 71% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1397 vs 817

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4400

• Around 17% higher core clock speed: 350 MHz vs 300 MHz
• Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 275 vs 241
• Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1381 vs 878
• Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3044 vs 2227
• Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1381 vs 878
• Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3044 vs 2227
• 2.5x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 152 vs 62

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 620
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4400

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1042 524
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	241 275
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4592 2143
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.062 7.844
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	273.504 154.696
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.777 0.958
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19.939 9.084
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	31.881 8.335
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1397 817
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	878 1381
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2227 3044
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1397 817
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	878 1381
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2227 3044
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	62 152

Compare specifications (specs)