Intel UHD Graphics 620 vs Intel UHD Graphics 630

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 620 and Intel UHD Graphics 630 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 620

• Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 31.881 vs 29.327

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 630

• Around 17% higher core clock speed: 350 MHz vs 300 MHz
• Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1150 MHz
• Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1237 vs 1042
• Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 299 vs 241
• Around 1% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4657 vs 4592
• Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.517 vs 27.062
• Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 354.254 vs 273.504
• Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.807 vs 1.777
• Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 20.323 vs 19.939
• Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1870 vs 1397
• Around 82% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1596 vs 878
• Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3309 vs 2227
• Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1870 vs 1397
• Around 82% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1596 vs 878
• Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3309 vs 2227
• Around 10% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 68 vs 62

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 620
GPU 2: Intel UHD Graphics 630

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1042 1237
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	241 299
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4592 4657
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.062 27.517
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	273.504 354.254
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.777 1.807
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19.939 20.323
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	31.881 29.327
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1397 1870
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	878 1596
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2227 3309
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1397 1870
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	878 1596
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2227 3309
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	62 68

Compare specifications (specs)