Intel UHD Graphics 620 vs NVIDIA GeForce 920M

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 620 and NVIDIA GeForce 920M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 620

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 33 Watt
• 8x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 4 GB
• Around 46% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1042 vs 716
• 2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 241 vs 119
• Around 23% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4592 vs 3722
• 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.062 vs 8.358
• Around 74% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 273.504 vs 157.606
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.777 vs 0.843
• Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.939 vs 15.374

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 920M

• 3.2x more core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 300 MHz
• 16x more pipelines: 384 vs 24
• Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 40.443 vs 31.881
• Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1598 vs 1397
• 4.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3636 vs 878
• Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 2227
• Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1598 vs 1397
• 4.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3636 vs 878
• Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 2227
• 5.3x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 326 vs 62

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 620
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 920M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1042 716
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	241 119
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4592 3722
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.062 8.358
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	273.504 157.606
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.777 0.843
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19.939 15.374
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	31.881 40.443
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1397 1598
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	878 3636
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2227 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1397 1598
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	878 3636
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2227 3358
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	62 326

Compare specifications (specs)