Intel UHD Graphics 620 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 620 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 620

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• Around 17% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 980 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 10x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 150 Watt
• 16x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 2 GB

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti

• 3.1x more core clock speed: 915 MHz vs 300 MHz
• 56x more pipelines: 1344 vs 24
• 4.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4413 vs 1042
• Around 94% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 468 vs 241
• 3.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15375 vs 4592
• Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 36.256 vs 27.062
• 3.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1029.267 vs 273.504
• Around 71% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.037 vs 1.777
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 45.894 vs 19.939
• 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 82.191 vs 31.881
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3285 vs 1397
• 4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3684 vs 878
• Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3337 vs 2227
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3285 vs 1397
• 4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3684 vs 878
• Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3337 vs 2227
• 26x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1615 vs 62

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 620
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1042 4413
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	241 468
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4592 15375
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.062 36.256
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	273.504 1029.267
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.777 3.037
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19.939 45.894
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	31.881 82.191
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1397 3285
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	878 3684
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2227 3337
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1397 3285
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	878 3684
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2227 3337
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	62 1615

Compare specifications (specs)