Intel UHD Graphics 620 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 620 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 620
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 13% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 1019 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 20x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 300 Watt
- 8x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 4 GB (4 GB per GPU) GDDR5
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2227 vs 1673
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2227 vs 1673
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 September 2017 vs 3 May 2012 |
| Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz vs 1019 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 300 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 4 GB (4 GB per GPU) GDDR5 |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2227 vs 1673 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2227 vs 1673 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690
- 3.1x more core clock speed: 915 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 128x more pipelines: 2x 1536 vs 24
- 5.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5467 vs 1042
- Around 95% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 471 vs 241
- 3.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 16577 vs 4592
- Around 71% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 46.352 vs 27.062
- 3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 930.114 vs 273.504
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.656 vs 1.777
- Around 50% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 29.836 vs 19.939
- 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 97.861 vs 31.881
- 4.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6875 vs 1397
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1849 vs 878
- 4.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6875 vs 1397
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1849 vs 878
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 915 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 2x 1536 vs 24 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5467 vs 1042 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 471 vs 241 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 16577 vs 4592 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.352 vs 27.062 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 930.114 vs 273.504 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.656 vs 1.777 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.836 vs 19.939 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 97.861 vs 31.881 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6875 vs 1397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1849 vs 878 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6875 vs 1397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1849 vs 878 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 620
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel UHD Graphics 620 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1042 | 5467 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 241 | 471 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4592 | 16577 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.062 | 46.352 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 273.504 | 930.114 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.777 | 3.656 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.939 | 29.836 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 31.881 | 97.861 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1397 | 6875 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 878 | 1849 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2227 | 1673 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1397 | 6875 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 878 | 1849 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2227 | 1673 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 62 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel UHD Graphics 620 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Kepler |
| Code name | Kaby Lake GT2 | GK104 |
| Launch date | 1 September 2017 | 3 May 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 1380 | 717 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | |
| Price now | $999 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 7.01 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | 1019 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 915 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 24 | 2x 1536 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 300 Watt |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 3,540 million |
| CUDA cores | 3072 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 3,130 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 234 billion / sec | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 3x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort, Two Dual Link DVI-I. One Dual link DVI-D. One Mini... |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Length | 11.0" (27.9 cm) | |
| SLI options | Quad | |
| Supplementary power connectors | Two 8-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.2 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 4 GB (4 GB per GPU) GDDR5 |
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 512-bit (256-bit per GPU) |
| Memory type | LPDDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
| Memory bandwidth | 384 GB / s | |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel UHD Graphics 620 with others
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
ATIMobility Radeon 7500
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
ATIAll-In-Wonder 9000 PRO
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M340
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 910M
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
IntelHD Graphics 520
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8370D IGP
