Intel UHD Graphics 620 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics 620 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 620
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 ans 3 mois plus tard
- Environ 13% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1150 MHz versus 1019 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 20x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 300 Watt
- 8x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 32 GB versus 4 GB (4 GB per GPU) GDDR5
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2227 versus 1673
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2227 versus 1673
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 versus 3 May 2012 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1150 MHz versus 1019 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 300 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 32 GB versus 4 GB (4 GB per GPU) GDDR5 |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2227 versus 1673 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2227 versus 1673 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690
- 3.1x plus de vitesse du noyau: 915 MHz versus 300 MHz
- 128x plus de pipelines: 2x 1536 versus 24
- 5.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 5467 versus 1042
- Environ 95% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 471 versus 241
- 3.6x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 16577 versus 4592
- Environ 71% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 46.352 versus 27.062
- 3.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 930.114 versus 273.504
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.656 versus 1.777
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 29.836 versus 19.939
- 3.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 97.861 versus 31.881
- 4.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6875 versus 1397
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1849 versus 878
- 4.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6875 versus 1397
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1849 versus 878
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 915 MHz versus 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 2x 1536 versus 24 |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5467 versus 1042 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 471 versus 241 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 16577 versus 4592 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.352 versus 27.062 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 930.114 versus 273.504 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.656 versus 1.777 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.836 versus 19.939 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 97.861 versus 31.881 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6875 versus 1397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1849 versus 878 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6875 versus 1397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1849 versus 878 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 620
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel UHD Graphics 620 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1042 | 5467 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 241 | 471 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4592 | 16577 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.062 | 46.352 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 273.504 | 930.114 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.777 | 3.656 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.939 | 29.836 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 31.881 | 97.861 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1397 | 6875 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 878 | 1849 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2227 | 1673 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1397 | 6875 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 878 | 1849 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2227 | 1673 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 62 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel UHD Graphics 620 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | Kaby Lake GT2 | GK104 |
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 | 3 May 2012 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1380 | 717 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $999 | |
| Prix maintenant | $999 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 7.01 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1150 MHz | 1019 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 915 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 24 | 2x 1536 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 300 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 189 million | 3,540 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 3072 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 2x 3,130 gflops | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 234 billion / sec | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 3x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort, Two Dual Link DVI-I. One Dual link DVI-D. One Mini... |
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Longeur | 11.0" (27.9 cm) | |
| Options SLI | Quad | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | Two 8-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.2 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 32 GB | 4 GB (4 GB per GPU) GDDR5 |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 512-bit (256-bit per GPU) |
| Genre de mémoire | LPDDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 384 GB / s | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6008 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel UHD Graphics 620 avec des autres
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
ATIMobility Radeon 7500
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
ATIAll-In-Wonder 9000 PRO
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M340
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 910M
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
IntelHD Graphics 520
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8370D IGP
