Intel UHD Graphics 620 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 620 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 620
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 30% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 888 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 8.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 130 Watt
- 21.3x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 1536 MB
| Launch date | 1 September 2017 vs 27 June 2013 |
| Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz vs 888 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 130 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 1536 MB |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM
- 2.7x more core clock speed: 823 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 48x more pipelines: 1152 vs 24
- 2.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11782 vs 4592
- 4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3713 vs 878
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 2227
- 4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3713 vs 878
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 2227
- 21.5x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1333 vs 62
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 823 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 1152 vs 24 |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11782 vs 4592 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 vs 878 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 2227 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 vs 878 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 2227 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1333 vs 62 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 620
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | Intel UHD Graphics 620 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1042 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 241 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4592 | 11782 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.062 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 273.504 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.777 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.939 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 31.881 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1397 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 878 | 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2227 | 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1397 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 878 | 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2227 | 3353 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 62 | 1333 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel UHD Graphics 620 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Kepler |
| Code name | Kaby Lake GT2 | GK104 |
| Launch date | 1 September 2017 | 27 June 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 1380 | 854 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | 888 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 823 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 24 | 1152 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 130 Watt |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 3,540 million |
| Floating-point performance | 2,046 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 85.25 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 241 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 1536 MB |
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory type | LPDDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
| Memory bandwidth | 134.4 GB / s | |
| Memory clock speed | 5600 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel UHD Graphics 620 with others
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
ATIMobility Radeon 7500
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
ATIAll-In-Wonder 9000 PRO
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M340
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 910M
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
IntelHD Graphics 520
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8370D IGP
