Intel UHD Graphics 620 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 620 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 620

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 45 Watt
• 16x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 241 vs 225

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M

• 26.7x more pipelines: 640 vs 24
• 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2521 vs 1042
• 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9809 vs 4592
• Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 37.761 vs 27.062
• Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 388.248 vs 273.504
• Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.428 vs 1.777
• Around 95% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 38.889 vs 19.939
• 4.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 151.016 vs 31.881
• 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3817 vs 1397
• 4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3685 vs 878
• Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 2227
• 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3817 vs 1397
• 4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3685 vs 878
• Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 2227
• 15.8x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 979 vs 62

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 620
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1042 2521
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	241 225
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4592 9809
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.062 37.761
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	273.504 388.248
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.777 2.428
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19.939 38.889
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	31.881 151.016
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1397 3817
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	878 3685
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2227 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1397 3817
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	878 3685
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2227 3353
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	62 979

Compare specifications (specs)