Intel UHD Graphics 620 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics 620 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 620
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 5 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 45 Watt
- 16x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 32 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 241 versus 225
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 versus 12 March 2014 |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 45 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 32 GB versus 2 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 241 versus 225 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M
- 26.7x plus de pipelines: 640 versus 24
- 2.4x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2521 versus 1042
- 2.1x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 9809 versus 4592
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 37.761 versus 27.062
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 388.248 versus 273.504
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.428 versus 1.777
- Environ 95% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 38.889 versus 19.939
- 4.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 151.016 versus 31.881
- 2.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3817 versus 1397
- 4.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3685 versus 878
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 versus 2227
- 2.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3817 versus 1397
- 4.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3685 versus 878
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 versus 2227
- 15.8x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 979 versus 62
| Caractéristiques | |
| Pipelines | 640 versus 24 |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2521 versus 1042 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9809 versus 4592 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.761 versus 27.062 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 388.248 versus 273.504 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.428 versus 1.777 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.889 versus 19.939 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 151.016 versus 31.881 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3817 versus 1397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 versus 878 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 versus 2227 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3817 versus 1397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 versus 878 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 versus 2227 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 979 versus 62 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 620
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | Intel UHD Graphics 620 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1042 | 2521 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 241 | 225 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4592 | 9809 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.062 | 37.761 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 273.504 | 388.248 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.777 | 2.428 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.939 | 38.889 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 31.881 | 151.016 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1397 | 3817 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 878 | 3685 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2227 | 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1397 | 3817 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 878 | 3685 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2227 | 3353 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 62 | 979 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel UHD Graphics 620 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Maxwell |
| Nom de code | Kaby Lake GT2 | GM107 |
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 | 12 March 2014 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1380 | 896 |
| Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1150 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 24 | 640 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 189 million | 1,870 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 640 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,155 gflops | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 36.08 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 32 GB | 2 GB |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Genre de mémoire | LPDDR3 / DDR4 | DDR3, GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | 0 |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 80.0 GB / s | |
| Configuration standard de la mémoire | DDR3 or GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Ansel | ||
| BatteryBoost | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel UHD Graphics 620 avec des autres
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
ATIMobility Radeon 7500
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
ATIAll-In-Wonder 9000 PRO
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M340
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 910M
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
IntelHD Graphics 520
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8370D IGP
