Intel UHD Graphics 620 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 620 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 620

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 75 Watt
• 8x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 4 GB

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M

• 3.7x more core clock speed: 1096 MHz vs 300 MHz
• Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1176 MHz vs 1150 MHz
• 26.7x more pipelines: 640 vs 24
• 3.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3366 vs 1042
• Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 245 vs 241
• 2.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10985 vs 4592
• 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 54.294 vs 27.062
• 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 795.325 vs 273.504
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.692 vs 1.777
• 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 51.794 vs 19.939
• 5.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 174.513 vs 31.881
• 3.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5264 vs 1397
• 4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 vs 878
• Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 2227
• 3.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5264 vs 1397
• 4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 vs 878
• Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 2227
• 19.9x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1231 vs 62

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 620
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1042 3366
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	241 245
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4592 10985
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.062 54.294
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	273.504 795.325
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.777 3.692
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19.939 51.794
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	31.881 174.513
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1397 5264
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	878 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2227 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1397 5264
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	878 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2227 3358
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	62 1231

Compare specifications (specs)