Intel UHD Graphics 620 vs NVIDIA Quadro P600
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 620 and NVIDIA Quadro P600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 620
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 40 Watt
- 16x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 2 GB
Launch date | 1 September 2017 vs 7 February 2017 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 40 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 2 GB |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P600
- 4.4x more core clock speed: 1329 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 35% higher boost clock speed: 1557 MHz vs 1150 MHz
- 16x more pipelines: 384 vs 24
- 3.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3327 vs 1042
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 542 vs 241
- 2.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11181 vs 4592
- Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 35.134 vs 27.062
- 4.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 141.164 vs 31.881
- 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4662 vs 1397
- 4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 878
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 2227
- 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4662 vs 1397
- 4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 878
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 2227
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1329 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1557 MHz vs 1150 MHz |
Pipelines | 384 vs 24 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3327 vs 1042 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 542 vs 241 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11181 vs 4592 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 35.134 vs 27.062 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 141.164 vs 31.881 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4662 vs 1397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 878 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 2227 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4662 vs 1397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 878 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 2227 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 620
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P600
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel UHD Graphics 620 | NVIDIA Quadro P600 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1042 | 3327 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 241 | 542 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4592 | 11181 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.062 | 35.134 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 273.504 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.777 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.939 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 31.881 | 141.164 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1397 | 4662 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 878 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2227 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1397 | 4662 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 878 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2227 | 3359 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 62 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel UHD Graphics 620 | NVIDIA Quadro P600 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Pascal |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT2 | GP107 |
Launch date | 1 September 2017 | 7 February 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 1380 | 556 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $178 | |
Price now | $169.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 22.11 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | 1557 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1329 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | 384 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 40 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 3,300 million |
Floating-point performance | 1,117 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 34.92 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 145 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory type | LPDDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Memory bandwidth | 64.19 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 4012 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |