Intel UHD Graphics 620 versus NVIDIA Quadro P600
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics 620 and NVIDIA Quadro P600 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 620
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 6 mois plus tard
- 2.7x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 40 Watt
- 16x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 32 GB versus 2 GB
Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 versus 7 February 2017 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 40 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 32 GB versus 2 GB |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro P600
- 4.4x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1329 MHz versus 300 MHz
- Environ 35% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1557 MHz versus 1150 MHz
- 16x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 24
- 3.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3327 versus 1042
- 2.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 542 versus 241
- 2.4x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 11181 versus 4592
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 35.134 versus 27.062
- 4.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 141.164 versus 31.881
- 3.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4662 versus 1397
- 4.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 versus 878
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 versus 2227
- 3.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4662 versus 1397
- 4.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 versus 878
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 versus 2227
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1329 MHz versus 300 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1557 MHz versus 1150 MHz |
Pipelines | 384 versus 24 |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3327 versus 1042 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 542 versus 241 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11181 versus 4592 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 35.134 versus 27.062 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 141.164 versus 31.881 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4662 versus 1397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 versus 878 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 2227 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4662 versus 1397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 versus 878 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 2227 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 620
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P600
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | Intel UHD Graphics 620 | NVIDIA Quadro P600 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1042 | 3327 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 241 | 542 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4592 | 11181 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.062 | 35.134 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 273.504 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.777 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.939 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 31.881 | 141.164 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1397 | 4662 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 878 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2227 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1397 | 4662 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 878 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2227 | 3359 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 62 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
Intel UHD Graphics 620 | NVIDIA Quadro P600 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Pascal |
Nom de code | Kaby Lake GT2 | GP107 |
Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 | 7 February 2017 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1380 | 556 |
Genre | Laptop | Workstation |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $178 | |
Prix maintenant | $169.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 22.11 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1150 MHz | 1557 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 1329 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | 384 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 40 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 189 million | 3,300 million |
Performance á point flottant | 1,117 gflops | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 34.92 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 145 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 32 GB | 2 GB |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Genre de mémoire | LPDDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 64.19 GB / s | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 4012 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |