Intel UHD Graphics 630 vs AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 630 and AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 630
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 14% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- Around 14% higher texture fill rate: 28.8 GTexel / s vs 25.2 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 4.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 65 Watt
- Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1870 vs 1106
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3309 vs 3260
- Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1870 vs 1106
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3309 vs 3260
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 September 2017 vs 5 May 2015 |
| Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 28.8 GTexel / s vs 25.2 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 65 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1870 vs 1106 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 vs 3260 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1870 vs 1106 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 vs 3260 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM
- 2.6x more core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 350 MHz
- 16x more pipelines: 384 vs 24
- Around 75% better floating-point performance: 806.4 gflops vs 460.8 gflops
- Around 11% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5150 vs 4657
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1841 vs 1596
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1841 vs 1596
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz vs 350 MHz |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 24 |
| Floating-point performance | 806.4 gflops vs 460.8 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5150 vs 4657 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1841 vs 1596 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1841 vs 1596 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1237 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 299 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4657 | 5150 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.517 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 354.254 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.807 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.323 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 29.327 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1870 | 1106 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1596 | 1841 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 | 3260 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1870 | 1106 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1596 | 1841 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 | 3260 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 68 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel UHD Graphics 630 | AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Coffee Lake GT2 | Oland |
| Launch date | 1 September 2017 | 5 May 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 1234 | 1281 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 460.8 gflops | 806.4 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 24 | 384 |
| Texture fill rate | 28.8 GTexel / s | 25.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 1,040 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB / s | |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel UHD Graphics 630 with others
IntelUHD Graphics 630 vs
ATIRadeon 9200 PRO
IntelUHD Graphics 630 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6550D
IntelUHD Graphics 630 vs
AMDRadeon R7 240
IntelUHD Graphics 630 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 840M
IntelUHD Graphics 630 vs
IntelUHD Graphics 617
IntelUHD Graphics 630 vs
AMDRadeon 680M
