Intel UHD Graphics 630 vs AMD Radeon R7 Graphics

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 630 and AMD Radeon R7 Graphics videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 630

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• Around 75% higher core clock speed: 350 MHz vs 200 MHz
• Around 58% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 758 MHz
• Around 75% higher texture fill rate: 28.8 GTexel / s vs 16.46 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 82% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.517 vs 15.145
• Around 72% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 354.254 vs 206.354
• Around 51% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.807 vs 1.2
• 55.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1870 vs 33.5
• 47.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1596 vs 33.9
• 55.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3309 vs 60

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 Graphics

• 16x more pipelines: 384 vs 24
• Around 14% better floating-point performance: 526.8 gflops vs 460.8 gflops
• 4.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 22612 vs 4657
• Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 24.15 vs 20.323
• 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 85.46 vs 29.327
• Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1979 vs 1870
• Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2101 vs 1596
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3309
• 21.4x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1457 vs 68

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 Graphics

Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4657 22612
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.517 15.145
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	354.254 206.354
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.807 1.2
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20.323 24.15
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	29.327 85.46
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1870 1979
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1596 2101
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3309 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1870 33.5
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1596 33.9
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3309 60
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	68 1457

Compare specifications (specs)