Intel UHD Graphics 630 vs AMD Radeon RX 580
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 630 and AMD Radeon RX 580 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 630
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
- 74.3x better floating-point performance: 460.8 gflops vs 6.2 TFLOPs
- 12.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 185 Watt
Launch date | 1 September 2017 vs 18 April 2017 |
Floating-point performance | 460.8 gflops vs 6.2 TFLOPs |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 185 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 580
- 3.6x more core clock speed: 1257 MHz vs 350 MHz
- Around 12% higher boost clock speed: 1340 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- 6700x more texture fill rate: 192.96 GTexel/s vs 28.8 GTexel / s
- 96x more pipelines: 2304 vs 24
- 7.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8827 vs 1237
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 767 vs 299
- 8.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 39028 vs 4657
- 4.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 116.142 vs 27.517
- 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1022.932 vs 354.254
- 5.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 9.235 vs 1.807
- 4.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 84.034 vs 20.323
- 20.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 607.721 vs 29.327
- 6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11281 vs 1870
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3695 vs 1596
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3349 vs 3309
- 6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11281 vs 1870
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3695 vs 1596
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3349 vs 3309
- 14.8x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1005 vs 68
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1257 MHz vs 350 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1340 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 192.96 GTexel/s vs 28.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2304 vs 24 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8827 vs 1237 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 767 vs 299 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39028 vs 4657 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 116.142 vs 27.517 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1022.932 vs 354.254 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.235 vs 1.807 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 84.034 vs 20.323 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 607.721 vs 29.327 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11281 vs 1870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3695 vs 1596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 vs 3309 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11281 vs 1870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3695 vs 1596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 vs 3309 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1005 vs 68 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 580
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | AMD Radeon RX 580 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1237 | 8827 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 299 | 767 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4657 | 39028 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.517 | 116.142 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 354.254 | 1022.932 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.807 | 9.235 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.323 | 84.034 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 29.327 | 607.721 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1870 | 11281 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1596 | 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 | 3349 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1870 | 11281 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1596 | 3695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 | 3349 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 68 | 1005 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel UHD Graphics 630 | AMD Radeon RX 580 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | Coffee Lake GT2 | Polaris 20 |
Launch date | 1 September 2017 | 18 April 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 1234 | 341 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $229 | |
Price now | $169.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 76.21 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1340 MHz |
Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 1257 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 460.8 gflops | 6.2 TFLOPs |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | 2304 |
Texture fill rate | 28.8 GTexel / s | 192.96 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 185 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 5,700 million |
Compute units | 36 | |
Pixel fill rate | 42.88 GP/s | |
Render output units | 32 | |
Stream Processors | 2304 | |
Texture Units | 144 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Length | 241 mm | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 256 bit |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 256 GB/s | |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready |