Intel UHD Graphics 630 versus AMD Radeon RX 580

Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics 630 and AMD Radeon RX 580 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

Intel UHD Graphics 630

versus

AMD Radeon RX 580

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 630

La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 mois plus tard
74.3x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 460.8 gflops versus 6.2 TFLOPs
12.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 185 Watt

Date de sortie	1 September 2017 versus 18 April 2017
Performance á point flottant	460.8 gflops versus 6.2 TFLOPs
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt versus 185 Watt

Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 580

3.6x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1257 MHz versus 350 MHz
Environ 12% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1340 MHz versus 1200 MHz
times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 192.96 GTexel/s versus 28.8 GTexel / s
96x plus de pipelines: 2304 versus 24
7.1x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 8827 versus 1237
2.6x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 767 versus 299
8.4x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 39028 versus 4657
4.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 116.142 versus 27.517
2.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1022.932 versus 354.254
5.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 9.235 versus 1.807
4.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 84.034 versus 20.323
20.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 607.721 versus 29.327
6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11281 versus 1870
2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3695 versus 1596
Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3349 versus 3309
6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11281 versus 1870
2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3695 versus 1596
Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3349 versus 3309
14.8x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1005 versus 68

Caractéristiques
Vitesse du noyau	1257 MHz versus 350 MHz
Vitesse augmenté	1340 MHz versus 1200 MHz
Taux de remplissage de la texture	192.96 GTexel/s versus 28.8 GTexel / s
Pipelines	2304 versus 24
Référence
PassMark - G3D Mark	8827 versus 1237
PassMark - G2D Mark	767 versus 299
Geekbench - OpenCL	39028 versus 4657
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	116.142 versus 27.517
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1022.932 versus 354.254
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	9.235 versus 1.807
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	84.034 versus 20.323
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	607.721 versus 29.327
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	11281 versus 1870
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3695 versus 1596
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3349 versus 3309
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	11281 versus 1870
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3695 versus 1596
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3349 versus 3309
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	1005 versus 68

Comparer les références

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 580

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1237

8827

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

299

767

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

4657

39028

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

27.517

116.142

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

354.254

1022.932

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1.807

9.235

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

20.323

84.034

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

29.327

607.721

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1870

11281

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1596

3695

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3309

3349

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1870

11281

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1596

3695

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3309

3349

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

1005

Nom	Intel UHD Graphics 630	AMD Radeon RX 580
PassMark - G3D Mark	1237	8827
PassMark - G2D Mark	299	767
Geekbench - OpenCL	4657	39028
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	27.517	116.142
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	354.254	1022.932
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.807	9.235
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	20.323	84.034
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	29.327	607.721
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1870	11281
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1596	3695
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3309	3349
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1870	11281
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1596	3695
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3309	3349
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	68	1005

Comparer les caractéristiques

	Intel UHD Graphics 630	AMD Radeon RX 580
Essentiel
Architecture	Generation 9.5	GCN 4.0
Nom de code	Coffee Lake GT2	Polaris 20
Date de sortie	1 September 2017	18 April 2017
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance	1234	341
Genre	Desktop	Desktop
Conception		Radeon RX 500 Series
Génération GCN		4th Gen
Prix de sortie (MSRP)		$229
Prix maintenant		$169.99
Valeur pour le prix (0-100)		76.21
Infos techniques
Vitesse augmenté	1200 MHz	1340 MHz
Vitesse du noyau	350 MHz	1257 MHz
Performance á point flottant	460.8 gflops	6.2 TFLOPs
Processus de fabrication	14 nm	14 nm
Pipelines	24	2304
Taux de remplissage de la texture	28.8 GTexel / s	192.96 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt	185 Watt
Compte de transistor	189 million	5,700 million
Unités de Compute		36
Pixel fill rate		42.88 GP/s
Render output units		32
Stream Processors		2304
Texture Units		144
Sorties et ports de vidéo
Connecteurs d’écran	No outputs	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
Soutien de DisplayPort
Soutien de Dual-link DVI
HDMI
VGA
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x1	PCIe 3.0 x16
Bridgeless CrossFire
Longeur		241 mm
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU)		500 Watt
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires		1x 8-pin
Soutien API
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	12
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL		2.0
Vulkan
Mémoire
Largeur du bus mémoire	64 / 128 Bit	256 bit
Mémoire partagé	1
RAM maximale		8 GB
Bande passante de la mémoire		256 GB/s
Vitesse de mémoire		8000 MHz
Genre de mémoire		GDDR5
Technologies
Quick Sync
4K H264 Decode
4K H264 Encode
AMD Eyefinity
AMD Radeon™ Chill
AMD Radeon™ ReLive
AppAcceleration
CrossFire
FreeSync
H265/HEVC Decode
H265/HEVC Encode
HDMI 4K Support
LiquidVR
PowerTune
TrueAudio
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Code Engine (VCE)
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR)
VR Ready