Intel UHD Graphics 630 vs ATI Radeon HD 5770

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 630 and ATI Radeon HD 5770 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 630

• Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 10 month(s) later
• Around 41% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 850 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
• 7.2x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 108 Watt
• 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.89 vs 9.373
• Around 97% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.785 vs 0.906
• Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3309 vs 2799
• Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3309 vs 2799

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5770

• 2.4x more core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 350 MHz
• Around 18% higher texture fill rate: 34.0 GTexel / s vs 28.8 GTexel / s
• 33.3x more pipelines: 800 vs 24
• 3x better floating-point performance: 1,360.0 gflops vs 460.8 gflops
• Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1343 vs 1243
• Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 332 vs 302
• 2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10495 vs 4671
• Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 459.025 vs 340.911
• Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 27.022 vs 20.414
• Around 65% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 48.793 vs 29.514
• Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2636 vs 1870
• Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2673 vs 1596
• Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2636 vs 1870
• Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2673 vs 1596

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5770

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1243 1343
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	302 332
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4671 10495
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.89 9.373
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	340.911 459.025
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.785 0.906
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20.414 27.022
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	29.514 48.793
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1870 2636
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1596 2673
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3309 2799
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1870 2636
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1596 2673
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3309 2799

Compare specifications (specs)