Intel UHD Graphics 630 versus ATI Radeon HD 5770
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics 630 and ATI Radeon HD 5770 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 630
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 7 ans 10 mois plus tard
- Environ 41% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1200 MHz versus 850 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 40 nm
- 7.2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 108 Watt
- 3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.89 versus 9.373
- Environ 97% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.785 versus 0.906
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3309 versus 2799
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3309 versus 2799
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 versus 13 October 2009 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz versus 850 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 108 Watt |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.89 versus 9.373 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.785 versus 0.906 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 versus 2799 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 versus 2799 |
Raisons pour considerer le ATI Radeon HD 5770
- 2.4x plus de vitesse du noyau: 850 MHz versus 350 MHz
- Environ 18% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 34.0 GTexel / s versus 28.8 GTexel / s
- 33.3x plus de pipelines: 800 versus 24
- 3x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,360.0 gflops versus 460.8 gflops
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1343 versus 1243
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 333 versus 302
- 2.2x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 10495 versus 4671
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 459.025 versus 340.911
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 27.022 versus 20.414
- Environ 65% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 48.793 versus 29.514
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2636 versus 1870
- Environ 67% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2673 versus 1596
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2636 versus 1870
- Environ 67% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2673 versus 1596
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 850 MHz versus 350 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 34.0 GTexel / s versus 28.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 800 versus 24 |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,360.0 gflops versus 460.8 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1343 versus 1243 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 333 versus 302 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 10495 versus 4671 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 459.025 versus 340.911 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.022 versus 20.414 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 48.793 versus 29.514 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2636 versus 1870 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2673 versus 1596 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2636 versus 1870 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2673 versus 1596 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5770
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | ATI Radeon HD 5770 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1243 | 1343 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 302 | 333 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4671 | 10495 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.89 | 9.373 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 340.911 | 459.025 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.785 | 0.906 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.414 | 27.022 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 29.514 | 48.793 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1870 | 2636 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1596 | 2673 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 | 2799 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1870 | 2636 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1596 | 2673 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 | 2799 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 421 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel UHD Graphics 630 | ATI Radeon HD 5770 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | TeraScale 2 |
| Nom de code | Coffee Lake GT2 | Juniper |
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 | 13 October 2009 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1219 | 1093 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Conception | ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series | |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $159 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 350 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 460.8 gflops | 1,360.0 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 24 | 800 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 28.8 GTexel / s | 34.0 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 108 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 189 million | 1,040 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 208 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
| RAM maximale | 1 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 76.8 GB / s | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4800 MHz | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel UHD Graphics 630 avec des autres
IntelUHD Graphics 630 vs
NVIDIAGeForce FX 5900 ZT
IntelUHD Graphics 630 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 940M
IntelUHD Graphics 630 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M375
IntelUHD Graphics 630 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M460
IntelUHD Graphics 630 vs
IntelUHD Graphics 617
IntelUHD Graphics 630 vs
IntelIris Plus Graphics 940
