Intel UHD Graphics 630 vs NVIDIA GeForce 940M

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 630 and NVIDIA GeForce 940M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 630

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1176 MHz
• Around 2% higher texture fill rate: 28.8 GTexel / s vs 28.22 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 33 Watt
• Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1243 vs 1123
• Around 97% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 302 vs 153
• Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.89 vs 25.98
• 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 340.911 vs 168.449
• Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.785 vs 1.307

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 940M

• 3.1x more core clock speed: 1072 MHz vs 350 MHz
• 16x more pipelines: 384 vs 24
• Around 96% better floating-point performance: 903.2 gflops vs 460.8 gflops
• Around 24% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5791 vs 4672
• Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 21.837 vs 20.414
• 3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 101.399 vs 29.514
• Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2132 vs 1870
• Around 92% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3065 vs 1596
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 3309
• Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2132 vs 1870
• Around 92% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3065 vs 1596
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 3309
• Around 20% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 506 vs 421

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 940M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1243 1123
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	302 153
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4672 5791
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.89 25.98
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	340.911 168.449
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.785 1.307
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20.414 21.837
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	29.514 101.399
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1870 2132
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1596 3065
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3309 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1870 2132
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1596 3065
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3309 3357
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	421 506

Compare specifications (specs)