Intel UHD Graphics 630 vs AMD Radeon R9 M375

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 630 and AMD Radeon R9 M375 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 630

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
  • Around 18% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1015 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1243 vs 970
  • Around 86% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 301 vs 162
  • Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 340.911 vs 272.547
  • Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3309 vs 2112
  • Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3309 vs 2112
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 1 September 2017 vs 5 May 2015
Boost clock speed 1200 MHz vs 1015 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 1243 vs 970
PassMark - G2D Mark 301 vs 162
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 340.911 vs 272.547
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3309 vs 2112
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3309 vs 2112

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M375

  • 2.9x more core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 350 MHz
  • Around 41% higher texture fill rate: 40.6 GTexel / s vs 28.8 GTexel / s
  • 26.7x more pipelines: 640 vs 24
  • 2.8x better floating-point performance: 1,299 gflops vs 460.8 gflops
  • 2.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10853 vs 4643
  • Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 29.048 vs 27.491
  • Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.024 vs 1.785
  • Around 76% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 35.994 vs 20.414
  • 4.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 142.872 vs 29.514
  • Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2227 vs 1870
  • Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1850 vs 1596
  • Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2227 vs 1870
  • Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1850 vs 1596
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1000 MHz vs 350 MHz
Texture fill rate 40.6 GTexel / s vs 28.8 GTexel / s
Pipelines 640 vs 24
Floating-point performance 1,299 gflops vs 460.8 gflops
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 10853 vs 4643
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 29.048 vs 27.491
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 2.024 vs 1.785
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 35.994 vs 20.414
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 142.872 vs 29.514
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2227 vs 1870
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1850 vs 1596
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2227 vs 1870
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1850 vs 1596

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M375

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1243
970
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
301
162
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
4643
10853
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
27.491
29.048
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
340.911
272.547
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1.785
2.024
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
20.414
35.994
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
29.514
142.872
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1870
2227
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1596
1850
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3309
2112
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1870
2227
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1596
1850
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3309
2112
Name Intel UHD Graphics 630 AMD Radeon R9 M375
PassMark - G3D Mark 1243 970
PassMark - G2D Mark 301 162
Geekbench - OpenCL 4643 10853
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 27.491 29.048
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 340.911 272.547
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.785 2.024
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 20.414 35.994
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 29.514 142.872
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1870 2227
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1596 1850
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3309 2112
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1870 2227
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1596 1850
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3309 2112
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 420

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel UHD Graphics 630 AMD Radeon R9 M375

Essentials

Architecture Generation 9.5 GCN 1.0
Code name Coffee Lake GT2 Tropo
Launch date 1 September 2017 5 May 2015
Place in performance rating 1240 1243
Type Desktop Desktop
Design AMD Radeon R9 300 Series

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1200 MHz 1015 MHz
Core clock speed 350 MHz 1000 MHz
Floating-point performance 460.8 gflops 1,299 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 24 640
Texture fill rate 28.8 GTexel / s 40.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt
Transistor count 189 million 1,500 million
Compute units 10

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
Eyefinity

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x1 PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus support PCIe 3.0
Laptop size medium sized

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 12
OpenGL 4.6 4.4
Mantle
OpenCL Not Listed
Vulkan

Memory

Memory bus width 64 / 128 Bit 128 bit
Shared memory 1 0
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 28.8 GB / s
Memory clock speed 1100 MHz
Memory type DDR3

Technologies

Quick Sync
AMD Eyefinity
AppAcceleration
DualGraphics
Enduro
FreeSync
HD3D
PowerTune
Switchable graphics
ZeroCore