Intel UHD Graphics 630 vs AMD Radeon R9 M375

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 630 and AMD Radeon R9 M375 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 630

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• Around 18% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1015 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1243 vs 970
• Around 86% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 301 vs 162
• Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 340.911 vs 272.547
• Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3309 vs 2112
• Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3309 vs 2112

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M375

• 2.9x more core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 350 MHz
• Around 41% higher texture fill rate: 40.6 GTexel / s vs 28.8 GTexel / s
• 26.7x more pipelines: 640 vs 24
• 2.8x better floating-point performance: 1,299 gflops vs 460.8 gflops
• 2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10130 vs 4641
• Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 29.048 vs 27.491
• Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.024 vs 1.785
• Around 76% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 35.994 vs 20.414
• 4.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 142.872 vs 29.514
• Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2227 vs 1870
• Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1850 vs 1596
• Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2227 vs 1870
• Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1850 vs 1596

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M375

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1243 970
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	301 162
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4641 10130
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.491 29.048
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	340.911 272.547
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.785 2.024
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20.414 35.994
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	29.514 142.872
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1870 2227
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1596 1850
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3309 2112
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1870 2227
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1596 1850
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3309 2112

Compare specifications (specs)