Intel UHD Graphics 630 vs Intel HD Graphics 4400

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 630 and Intel HD Graphics 4400 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 630

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1150 MHz
• 6.3x more texture fill rate: 28.8 GTexel / s vs 4.6 GTexel / s
• Around 20% higher pipelines: 24 vs 20
• 10x better floating-point performance: 460.8 gflops vs 46 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 22 nm
• Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 20 Watt
• 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1237 vs 524
• Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 299 vs 275
• 2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4657 vs 2143
• 3.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.517 vs 7.844
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 354.254 vs 154.696
• Around 89% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.807 vs 0.958
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 20.323 vs 9.084
• 3.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 29.327 vs 8.335
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1870 vs 817
• Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1596 vs 1381
• Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3309 vs 3044
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1870 vs 817
• Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1596 vs 1381
• Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3309 vs 3044

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4400

• 2.2x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 152 vs 68

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4400

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1237 524
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	299 275
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4657 2143
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.517 7.844
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	354.254 154.696
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.807 0.958
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20.323 9.084
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	29.327 8.335
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1870 817
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1596 1381
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3309 3044
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1870 817
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1596 1381
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3309 3044
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	68 152

Compare specifications (specs)