Intel UHD Graphics 630 vs Intel HD Graphics 4600

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 630 and Intel HD Graphics 4600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 630

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• 5.8x more texture fill rate: 28.8 GTexel / s vs 5 GTexel / s
• Around 20% higher pipelines: 24 vs 20
• 9.2x better floating-point performance: 460.8 gflops vs 50 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 22 nm
• 3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 45 Watt
• Around 96% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1237 vs 630
• Around 45% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4657 vs 3210
• 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.517 vs 8.844
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 354.254 vs 171.17
• Around 62% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.807 vs 1.115
• Around 96% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 20.323 vs 10.385
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 29.327 vs 12.361
• Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1870 vs 988
• Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3309 vs 2808
• Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1870 vs 988
• Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3309 vs 2808

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4600

• Around 14% higher core clock speed: 400 MHz vs 350 MHz
• Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 1200 MHz
• Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 314 vs 299
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1702 vs 1596
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1702 vs 1596
• 2.9x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 194 vs 68

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4600

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1237 630
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	299 314
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4657 3210
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.517 8.844
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	354.254 171.17
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.807 1.115
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20.323 10.385
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	29.327 12.361
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1870 988
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1596 1702
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3309 2808
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1870 988
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1596 1702
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3309 2808
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	68 194

Compare specifications (specs)