Intel UHD Graphics 630 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 420M

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 630 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 420M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 630

• Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• 4.8x more texture fill rate: 28.8 GTexel / s vs 6.0 billion / sec
• 2.4x better floating-point performance: 460.8 gflops vs 192 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
• Around 53% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 23 Watt
• 3.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1241 vs 396
• 3.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 301 vs 88
• 2.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4646 vs 1583
• 6.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.491 vs 4.329
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 340.911 vs 162.162
• 4.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.785 vs 0.426
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 29.514 vs 12.306
• 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1870 vs 737
• Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3309 vs 2906
• 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1870 vs 737
• Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3309 vs 2906

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 420M

• 2.9x more core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 350 MHz
• 4x more pipelines: 96 vs 24
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1731 vs 1596
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1731 vs 1596

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 420M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1241 396
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	301 88
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4646 1583
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.491 4.329
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	340.911 162.162
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.785 0.426
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	29.514 12.306
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1870 737
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1596 1731
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3309 2906
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1870 737
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1596 1731
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3309 2906

Compare specifications (specs)