Intel UHD Graphics 630 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 630 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 630

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• Around 22% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 980 MHz
• Around 84% higher texture fill rate: 28.8 GTexel / s vs 15.68 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 45 Watt
• Around 56% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1237 vs 793
• 2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 299 vs 149
• Around 20% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4657 vs 3866
• 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.517 vs 9.392
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 354.254 vs 157.479
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.807 vs 0.864
• Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 20.323 vs 16.101
• Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1870 vs 1589
• Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1870 vs 1589

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M

• 2.3x more core clock speed: 810 MHz vs 350 MHz
• 16x more pipelines: 384 vs 24
• Around 63% better floating-point performance: 752.6 gflops vs 460.8 gflops
• Around 53% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 44.77 vs 29.327
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3235 vs 1596
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3339 vs 3309
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3235 vs 1596
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3339 vs 3309
• 5.1x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 345 vs 68

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1237 793
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	299 149
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4657 3866
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.517 9.392
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	354.254 157.479
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.807 0.864
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20.323 16.101
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	29.327 44.77
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1870 1589
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1596 3235
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3309 3339
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1870 1589
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1596 3235
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3309 3339
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	68 345

Compare specifications (specs)